Ultralights 09-29-2005, 02:40 AM http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/4289930.stm
11 yr old boy caught driving without a licence, then as a punishment, banned from driving for a year! and lost of llicence points?????
how the fuk do you loose points on a licence you dont have, and be banned from doing something you cant already do????
preludedude 10-01-2005, 12:38 AM http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/4289930.stm
11 yr old boy caught driving without a licence, then as a punishment, banned from driving for a year! and lost of llicence points?????
how the fuk do you loose points on a licence you dont have, and be banned from doing something you cant already do????
a 11 yr old boy was driving when he no right to be, risking his life and everyone else on the road...and you concerned with the judges rulings? you have some nerve...
that boy deserves to be in jail with all the other useless citizens we have living here...the judge should have done much worse..
Mark
95SE
speed_monkey 10-01-2005, 12:40 AM read it again...
He is saying how can they take something away that you never had in the first place.
Say No To Pistons 10-01-2005, 11:24 AM some kid drove his moms sedan to the video store at night when he got bored and he drove back and tried to put it back in the driveway but he crashed.
2ndGen.Rocket 10-01-2005, 12:41 PM a 11 yr old boy was driving when he no right to be, risking his life and everyone else on the road...and you concerned with the judges rulings? you have some nerve...
that boy deserves to be in jail with all the other useless citizens we have living here...the judge should have done much worse..
Mark
95SE
I think you've got a slight reading problem....
He was saying it's ridiculous what sentence the judge gave to him, implying that he should have received a worse or different punishment.
aznpoopy 10-01-2005, 06:39 PM it was probably just a slap on the wrist because nothing actually happened.
you can't punish someone for what they might have done.
Manntis 10-01-2005, 11:26 PM no, but you can adequately punish them for what they did do.
If someone ran into a crowded shopping mall and sprayed the place with bullets, should they get a slap on the wrist if no one actually gets shot?
aznpoopy 10-01-2005, 11:56 PM thats a policy consideration that is not up to you or me. :)
for instance, in your example you could not charge the person with murder or manslaughter if nobody actually was actually killed.
Savington 10-02-2005, 12:09 AM some kid drove his moms sedan to the video store at night when he got bored and he drove back and tried to put it back in the driveway but he crashed.
Right, but that's different because the kid was like 3 or 4 and that's just fucking awesome. He didn't hit anything until he got back into the parking lot and tried to park the car, but since he couldn't hit the brakes he couldn't get it stopped.
Fucking spoiled brat.
2ndGen.Rocket 10-02-2005, 01:45 AM thats a policy consideration that is not up to you or me. :)
for instance, in your example you could not charge the person with murder or manslaughter if nobody actually was actually killed.
Intent.
That's all you need. When you advance more in the world of law school and come a few steps closer to being a scumbag dirt merchant lawyer, you'll know.
I'll still think you're an alright guy though.
aznpoopy 10-02-2005, 11:32 AM That's all you need. When you advance more in the world of law school and come a few steps closer to being a scumbag dirt merchant lawyer, you'll know.
I'll still think you're an alright guy though.
:rofl:
thanks man... i think. :)
7Stalker 10-02-2005, 11:31 PM Intent.
That's all you need. ...
For the sake of clarity, that's not all you need. You need a dead victim to charge someone with murder or manslaughter. Odds are, even if no one is killed in Manntis's example, you wouldn't secure an attempted murder charge. And the "intent" for manslaughter is significantly different from murder.
Cosby 10-03-2005, 10:28 AM I don't know anything about British law but I would imagine that the judge's ruling would be considered illegal here since the kid neither has a license nor the right to drive. That is like entering into a contract to murder someone. You can't have a 'contract' for something illegal and essentially judicial sanctions are the same with the exception that compensatory measures are taken in order to reward society.
7Stalker 10-03-2005, 12:52 PM Who knows, maybe in Britian, you need a license for a "Mini motor bike" and now that's suspended... a DMV could likely keep track of the judgement, and when the kid applies for a license, he'll find the points on it and have to pay more. If I get a ticket for which demerits apply, cancelling my license doesn't make them go away. Next time I apply or renew my license, the demerits will still be there
jhammons01 10-03-2005, 06:26 PM Hey! their in the UK!! What can I do about the idiots over there??
Anyway, maybe he has less than "0" points so he has to earns some to get to zero......who knows?
VelociRedBeast 10-04-2005, 02:00 PM Maybe he was driving very safely and correctly and the only reason he got pulled over was because he was so short. I mean if he was driving recklessly I'm sure he would have gone to Juvi..
That's just another P.o.V.
|