ok so this is how it starts. i rode my bike to the verrozano bridge today from my houseabout 6:30AM. so i was riding back from the bridge back to my house which was about 7:30-7:45 AM? so while i was riding back i was riding on the sidewalk (is it illegal to? i dont see cops arresting me.), so this lady was walking her fucking puny bitchy weiner dog and they were in front of me. so i slow down since the dog was looking at me barking just incase so i dont run over they peice of shit. so i slowly go by, and the fucking lady had the nerve to say "fucking stupid idiot doesnt know what a street is". i get pissed, i look around (while still riding slowly) point my middle fingur and yelled back at her sying "fuck you". she starts running after me, i get scared (shes fucking in her mid 40s, in good shape, 5'11 - 6'1?..she was fucking tall) i quickly sped up and went accross the street dodging a camry. then i heard a loud thump. thought to myself "ohhh fuck...couldnt be", looked around and she got fucking hit by the camry!!. the camry probably slowed down when it saw me go straight into the street out of no where so it mustve went 15-20mph. i quickly pedaled as fast as i could back to home (11 blocks away from where this happened). now im worried as fuck, could i be respondsible for the accident??? shes not dead im sure of that, but she was lying on the street when i took a peek. there was no one around there at that time as far as i know and i looked around to see if anyone followed me home. could she possibley blame me? im so fucking scared i cant even type right! help!!

hah.

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a303/Sup1661/b432592d.gif

karmas a bitch

teach her ass to talk shit, ever agian

i'm sorry, that's funny. No you should not be on the sidewalk.....technically. But who the hell uses them nowadays. You slowed and went by probably on the grass. Then she has to mouth off!!! I think it's funny.....she tries to chase you down and runs out in front of a car!!!

You have the right to express your freedom of speach. You have no responsiblilty for her attempted assault. You have no responsibility for her stupidity whilt attempting said assault.

You *could* get in trouble for leaving the scene, but since you neither hit her nor caused her to be hit, I don't think it would stand.

What a stupid bitch.

Leaving the scene???

He didn't "see" anything ;)

point of story: don't talk shit.

did the weiner dog run with her?

you violated nothing, now if you were chasing her and made her get hit.......your ass would be grass.....but im sure that's the story she's telling, that a guy on a bike was chasing her.

better hope the camry driver remembers you being in front....

what are you guys talking about he wasn't there??? he was at home sleeping! ;)

her fault for chasing you, i wouldnt care.

Natural selection............ hopefully she didn't have any offsprings.

Imagine if her son comes after u.

Not your fault that she was chasing you, and not your fault she got hit. You're golden.

This is awesome.

Natural selection............ hopefully she didn't have any offsprings.

Imagine if her son comes after u.

he'd get hit by a car as well!

HOLY SHIT this thread fucking ROCKS !!!!! HOLY SHIT YOU ARE AWESOME!!!

OH SHIT !!!!! I have shit like this happen to me all the time. I can't keep my mouth shut. I would say that I was in fear of my life so I didn't stop to see if she was ok. You probably did the right thing by not stopping. She would have been ranting if you had or trying to hit you.

ROTFL. Man that's awesome.

Legally bikes have to drive in the street, and use hand signals and whatnot.... just like a car.

So if you ever see a bike in the road.. yeah, he has the same right-of-ways as a car. But he has to signal with his hands.

That bitch got what she deserved... fucking anal retentive bitch... who gives a fuck if someone is riding on the sidewalk.

It'd be funny if her dog took a piss on her while she was lying on the ground. ;D

--Gary

i ride on the sidewalk all the time too, i pass by cops and whatever. no one ever cares. she probably just had a pole up her ass

i ride on the sidewalk all the time too, i pass by cops and whatever. no one ever cares. she probably just had a pole up her ass
Noo, She needed a pole in her ass PIIDB!!!!

no its not your fault...

on the small chance anyone comes asking, just say you gave her the finger and biked away, and you didn't even realize she was hit by a car.

You have no responsibility for her stupidity whilt attempting said assault.Tell that to the two guys being held on manslaughter charges here in Washington for stopping to chase two Indian kids who were firing bottle rockets at cars traveling along a busy street. One kid got the beat down he richly deserved while the other ran into traffic and was struck and killed by a car while trying to get away from them.

He's at fault simply because he left the scene of an accident and failed to render assistance in a situation he instigated. Whether or not it was his fault that she ran into the street after him is irrelevant at this point. If they catch up with him, he's probably fucked.

You're getting it backwards. In your scenario the kid that got hit was running "AWAY" from the assualters when he got hit by the car.

In This Scenario the Assaulter was the one that got hit while chasing the victom. Huge difference....and to boot, they can't prove that he saw anything. He was riding away when it happened.

You're getting it backwards. In your scenario the kid that got hit was running "AWAY" from the assualters when he got hit by the car. In This Scenario the Assaulter was the one that got hit while chasing the victom. Huge difference....Doesn't really matter. By your logic, McDonald's can't be liable for someone burning themselves with the hot coffee they were served because McDonald's didn't force them to put the coffee in their lap. Yet bodily harm did occur, and not as a result of direct force, and we all know the outcome.

The negligence occurred when the cyclist, knowing full well that he was being pursued according to his own testimony of the incident, headed into the road in an effort to escape pursuit. By his statement, he knew there was a car approaching. "i quickly sped up and went accross the street dodging a camry." A case could easily be made that he knew his pursuer would follow him into the road. I think any competent lawyer would have a field day with this one, but that's just my semi-educated opinion.

and to boot, they can't prove that he saw anything. He was riding away when it happened.Again, it doesn't matter. He was likely observed leaving the scene by either his pursuer or the occupants of the car, and either or both may have seen him stop and look back, which he did by his own admission. "then i heard a loud thump. thought to myself "ohhh fuck...couldnt be", looked around and she got fucking hit by the camry!!."

He doesn't know, and you're making an assumption which isn't logical; that he wasn't observed looking back prior to leaving the scene of an accident. It is more logical to assume that someone being pursued would ascertain whether or not they were still being pursued.

His final mistake was putting this all in writing on a public forum. :D

Regardless, this is pretty funny.

Well, it's law......and it could go either direction. So I can see your view point happening as well as mine. It would probalby come down to who was more credible. OR Who was a better LIAR.

And yes, Forensics could pull this out of the computor very easily.

Besides How can I argue with you?? one bad rep click from you and my dot would be red for months:bowdown:

It would probalby come down to who was more credible.Or who was injured and who wasn't... :)

In a bar fight, they automatically haul away the person with the least physical damage. Regardless of who started the fight, it's pretty obvious who won. The burden of proof is then on that person to prove that they acted in self defense, regardless of whether they threw the first punch or not.

In this case, we've got someone injured by a car due to a situation instigated by the cyclist. First, he was in the wrong by riding on the sidewalk anyway. Second, he didn't have to respond to the woman's comment. And third, once pursued, he headed into traffic in an attempt to lose his pursuer. You'd have a hell of a time proving that it was the woman's own fault that she was struck by a car, whether or not that's logically what happened.

The cyclist shares at least some of the blame, but the worst part is that he fled the scene knowing full well that the woman had been struck by the car. Even if he thought he'd get into trouble if by remaining at the scene, that's pretty low.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v217/DarkAngelKamui/OWN3D/1ownedcars.jpg

did that person head explode?

I don't know, My defense would be to plead ignorance.

"sure I flipped her off, and then I just rode off and never saw here again"

--------The cyclist being naturally faster this is plausible-----------
--------The wind in the ears masked any sounds--------
--------Yea, the cyclist looked back but never saw the woman lying on the ground, the cyclist was merely checking behind for traffic.----------

Any prosecution would have a very hard time trying to convince a jury that none of the above existed. and all you need is one to believe the cyclist story

point of story: don't talk shit.

did the weiner dog run with her?


haha...cody is worried about the wiener dog...hopefully, it didnt get hit..i used to have one, and they are cool as hell...mean as hell too..

ok. its been more than 24hrs since the incedent. so im good right? maybe...or am i?...anyways i dont think the dog got hit but i didnt see the dog laying next to her on the ground (as far as i know). i didnt go for a bike ride today even though it was a great day. BTW DAK, that pic of the car crashing into the guy, did you guys notice the man in the red jacket? looks like hes very happy or something. like "yeah!! woot woot! *does happy dance*"

I don't know, My defense would be to plead ignorance.

"sure I flipped her off, and then I just rode off and never saw here again"

--------The cyclist being naturally faster this is plausible-----------
--------The wind in the ears masked any sounds--------
--------Yea, the cyclist looked back but never saw the woman lying on the ground, the cyclist was merely checking behind for traffic.----------

Any prosecution would have a very hard time trying to convince a jury that none of the above existed. and all you need is one to believe the cyclist story

Yep. Remember the first rule of law: DENY, DENY, DENY!!

Yep. Remember the first rule of law: DENY, DENY, DENY!!
maybe the first rule should be "If you did it, fucking admit it."

Jimlab is mostly right. You failed to render aid and in part instigated it but she inflicted the damage on herself in an attempt to assualt you. There probably isn't much for criminal charges but MORE THAN ENOUGH for a civil case so I'd seriously keep this on the down low.

well i didnt lead her to the incoming car. what was i supposed to do? yelled out "hey lady watch it theres a car!!!" and watch her dodge the camry then push my off the bike?

this thread is evidence that you saw what happened...DELETE IT!

this thread is evidence that you saw what happened...DELETE IT!
Yea, she's at home printing it right now..........