|
|
BATMAN 05-09-2006, 09:32 AM Lesbians’ brains react differently to sex hormones than those of heterosexual women.
An earlier study of gay men also showed their brain response was different from straight men — an even stronger difference than has now been found in lesbians.
Lesbians’ brains reacted somewhat, though not completely, like those of heterosexual men, a team of Swedish researchers said in Tuesday’s edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
A year ago, the same group reported findings for gay men that showed their brain response to hormones was similar to that of heterosexual women.
Biological basis for sexual orientation?
In both cases the findings add weight to the idea that homosexuality has a physical basis and is not learned behavior.
“It shows sexual orientation may very well have a different basis between men and women ... this is not just a mirror image situation,” said Sandra Witelson, an expert on brain anatomy and sexual orientation at the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.
“The important thing is to be open to the likely situation that there are biological factors that contribute to sexual orientation,” added Witelson, who was not part of the research team.
The research team led by Ivanka Savic at the Stockholm Brain Institute had volunteers sniff chemicals derived from male and female sex hormones. These chemicals are thought to be pheromones — molecules known to trigger responses such as defense and sex in many animals.
Whether humans respond to pheromones has been debated, although in 2000 American researchers reported finding a gene that they believe directs a human pheromone receptor in the nose.
The same team reported last year on a comparison of the response of male homosexuals to heterosexual men and women. They found that the brains of gay men reacted more like those of women than of straight men.
The new study shows a similar, but weaker, relationship between the response of lesbians and straight men.
Heterosexual women found the male and female pheromones about equally pleasant, while straight men and lesbians liked the female pheromone more than the male one. Men and lesbians also found the male hormone more irritating than the female one, while straight women were more likely to be irritated by the female hormone than the male one.
All three groups rated the male hormone more familiar than the female one. Straight women found both hormones about equal in intensity, while lesbians and straight men found the male hormone more intense than the female one.
Hormones processed differently
The brains of all three groups were scanned when sniffing male and female hormones and a set of four ordinary odors. Ordinary odors were processed in the brain circuits associated with smell in all the volunteers.
In heterosexual males the male hormone was processed in the scent area but the female hormone was processed in the hypothalamus, which is related to sexual stimulation. In straight women the sexual area of the brain responded to the male hormone while the female hormone was perceived by the scent area.
In lesbians, both male and female hormones were processed the same, in the basic odor processing circuits, Savic and her team reported.
Each of the three groups of subjects included 12 healthy, unmedicated, right-handed and HIV-negative individuals.
The research was funded by the Swedish Medical Research Council, Karolinska Institute and the Wallenberg Foundation.
Say No To Pistons 05-09-2006, 02:17 PM read in the new york post today...
"gay's think like men"...
fcdrifter13 05-09-2006, 02:30 PM Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm lesbians.........................but only the hot ones.
Say No To Pistons 05-09-2006, 02:34 PM old ladies.
SpartanTS 05-09-2006, 04:05 PM YZF hit it on the head.
Now if only you could predict who's going to become gay, then run the same tests before they "come out" :rofl:
BATMAN 05-09-2006, 04:51 PM So are u guys saying that certain number of guys like to suck on dicksicles and get concave dent marks in their fudge?
Sorry, but I think alot of that is nature of what ur preference is.
Just look at all levels of animals and all level of human culture and IQ.
There is something about females that are attractive for me. I can't explain it, but I know i want tuna....
wonner 05-09-2006, 04:55 PM So are u guys saying that certain number of guys like to suck on dicksicles and get concave dent marks in their fudge?:roll: I <3 BATMAN :roll:
vrooom305 05-09-2006, 05:52 PM it's also proven that the human brain responds to learned behavior
this is just more of the same old crap: homosexuals attempting to excuse their immorality with pseudo science
trust me, it won't help them at the Judgment
okay after reading this post I believe in your God
Supper 05-09-2006, 07:44 PM okay after reading this post I believe in your God
my god... me too.
The end times are surely upon us now, we agree with YZF!!!!
:hide:
vrooom305 05-09-2006, 10:23 PM ^ so you don't like the fact that I'm agreeing with you and that I acknowledge God's existence?
Animal 05-09-2006, 10:47 PM According to commercials playing around here, some people are "born gay".
http://www.fairnessandequality.org/video/babyhigh.mov
that commercial
BATMAN 05-10-2006, 10:03 AM Sorry folks, while there are exceptions to most rules in the world, guys don't learn to be gay. U might learn how to act gay from observing slack jawwed faggots with weak wrists prancing around like bambi in the gay woods.
gayness is sexual orientation where u prefer to have some man push his trash compactor up ur willing waste canal. Or u prefer a fresh load of man chowder from the flesh tap.
it's simple as that.
Supper 05-10-2006, 11:13 AM god damnit.
At least we had a couple weeks of you not posting your bullshit.
Tofuball 05-10-2006, 12:09 PM I thought it was a book based on opinions back in the day.
In fact, most people who havent read it think that.
mazdaspeedrex 05-10-2006, 12:19 PM welcome to 2006 and beyond
it's as simple as what I stated....you opinion is absolutely worthless
You should take your own advice sometimes.
mazdaspeedrex 05-10-2006, 12:48 PM God isn't to blame for human sin
That's correct. Humans are supposed to have free will. You are free to believe in whatever myths you want. That doesn't make them wrong or right.
mazdaspeedrex 05-10-2006, 01:19 PM The allegories and myths in the bible, the old testament in particular, were the way they could explain the unexplainable in that time. Why does the sun rise? How did we get here? What happens when we die? Every major civilization had their own version to explain these types of question. What makes them wrong and yours the truth? Just because it lasted 3500 years? Where did you get that number by the way? How long have the Hindu been talking about their gods? They use different gods to answer the same questrions that the pentateuch does. The greeks/romans had their versions also. Why do we call theirs myths and yours truth? When you die and Charon ferries you across the river Styx to see Hades you might want to reconsider your beliefs.
mazdaspeedrex 05-10-2006, 02:09 PM You can't prove any of it. That is why it is called faith.
Main Entry: 1faith
Pronunciation: 'fAth
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural faiths /'fAths, sometimes 'fA[th]z/
Etymology: Middle English feith, from Old French feid, foi, from Latin fides; akin to Latin fidere to trust -- more at BIDE
1 a : allegiance to duty or a person : LOYALTY b (1) : fidelity to one's promises (2) : sincerity of intentions
2 a (1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2) : belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion b (1) : firm belief in something for which there is no proof (2) : complete trust
3 : something that is believed especially with strong conviction; especially : a system of religious beliefs
|