PDA

JOIN THE FORUM LOUNGE!

By Joining The Forum Lounge you will be able to see the pictures in this thread and post a reply. Also, after 25 posts you'll be able to see the hidden forums as well!

It's free and all of your information is confidential.

Click here to begin interacting!
Click here to register

Join in on this Discussion and see the pictures. Click here-> : Study: Sex-filled media linked to promiscuity


BATMAN
04-03-2006, 03:49 PM
Sexually charged music, magazines, TV and movies push youngsters into intercourse at an earlier age, perhaps by acting as kind of virtual peer that tells them everyone else is doing it, a study said on Monday.

“This is the first time we’ve shown that the more kids are exposed to sex in media the earlier they have sex,” said Jane Brown of the University of North Carolina, chief author of the report.

Previous research had been limited to television, said the study which looked at 1,017 adolescents when they were aged 12 to 14 and again two years later. They were checked on their exposure during the two years to 264 items — movies, TV shows, music and magazines — which were analyzed for their sexual content.

In general it found that the highest exposure levels led to more sexual activity, with white teens in the group 2.2 times more likely to have had intercourse at ages 14 to 16 than similar youngsters who had the least exposure.

The effect was not as pronounced for blacks, the study said, perhaps because the black youngsters in the study were already more sexually experienced than the whites were when the research began and thus were less influenced by media exposure over the two-year period.

The teenage pregnancy rate in the United States is three to 10 times higher than that found in other industrialized nations, making that and exposure to sexually transmitted infections a major public health concern, the study said.

Everybody's doing it
At the same time parents tend not to talk about sex with their children in a timely and comprehensive way, leaving a vacuum in which the media may become a powerful sex educator, providing “frequent and compelling portraits of sex as fun and risk free.”

“Interestingly one of the strongest predictors of risk for early sexual intercourse for both black and white teens (in the study) was the perception that his or her peers were having sex,” the report said.

Youngsters “may begin to believe the world view portrayed and may begin to adopt the media’s social norms as their own. Some, especially those who have fewer alternative sources of sexual norms, such as parents or friends, may use the media as a kind of sexual superpeer that encourages them to be sexually active,” the report added.

The study was published in the April issue of “Pediatrics,” the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A portion of the data was previously published in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

The study was done in several schools in North Carolina. The authors said that they did not measure the impact of exposure to sexual material on the Internet because when the research began in 2001 relatively few of the early adolescents in the sample had Internet access.

Additional research should include exposure to Web-based material, the study suggested.

“It took many studies over a number of years to establish that violence in the media increased children’s violent behavior and to begin initiatives to reduce harmful effects,” the study said.

“Given the consistent findings regarding media violence, it may be prudent not to wait decades to conclude that the media are also important sources of sexual norms for youth,” it added.

aznpoopy
04-03-2006, 04:27 PM
who the fuck pays out the money to do these pointless surveys and pseudo scientific studies?

i think you could reach the same conclusion if you just applied a bit of common sense.

DarkAngelKamui
04-04-2006, 07:32 AM
This gets my vote for "surprise of the year"....

Tofuball
04-04-2006, 07:40 AM
This gets my vote for "surprise of the year"....

+1

SpartanTS
04-04-2006, 08:27 AM
I've thought that TV/Media has had a link to promiscuity for quite a while, but with the turn of the millenium, it's the internet that is to blame.

DarkAngelKamui
04-04-2006, 08:56 AM
Well, the internet IS for porn after all...

Manntis
04-04-2006, 11:46 AM
thing is, past studies have linked rock 'n roll or the automobile to the rise in promescuity.

If media were the culprit, books such as Lady Chatterly's Lover and Bram Stoker's Dracula, both smutty in the Victorian era and both extremely popular, could be linked to the rise in promescuity - but they aren't.

In post WWII, the rise of the automobile as personal transportation allowed teens to get out of the house and do things unchaperoned - where hormones took over and back seats were used as often as front seats.

Rock 'n Roll (and, even earlier, Jazz) encouraged sexually suggestive dancing styles not seen before in public.

Remember, the late 50's begat the free-love promiscuous hippie culture of the 60's - long before TV would even say the word 'pregnant' on TV, let alone air shows like Sex in the City.

Tofuball
04-04-2006, 11:59 AM
Hrm, you know, thats a good point.

Animal
04-04-2006, 07:10 PM
The best study I ever saw was one I saw back in high school. Some researchers in the antarctic studied penguins for a year or somethign to see whether they fell over when planes flew overhead.

huh, google rocks :D

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/11/03/fringe.penguins.reut/index.html

fcdrifter13
04-04-2006, 07:20 PM
I blame the movie Porky's

Skylance
04-05-2006, 07:39 AM
If I may quote Ron White:

"I love it when the solution has absolutely nothing to do with the problem. Nah, this couldn't be a parenting problem, ohh nooo nooo."

aznpoopy
04-05-2006, 08:59 AM
parents can only do so much when the general consensus in society is that sex is the pwesome, and its okay to do it with lots of people.

mantis brought up an interesting counterargument, but i'm still going to have to say that flooding the public with a shitload of sexual themed media is going to make people have sex more.

Skylance
04-05-2006, 09:29 AM
parents can only do so much when the general consensus in society is that sex is the pwesome, and its okay to do it with lots of people.

mantis brought up an interesting counterargument, but i'm still going to have to say that flooding the public with a shitload of sexual themed media is going to make people have sex more.
I'm not going to deny that. I'm just tired of parents blaming their lack of good judgement on everything else. I know the parents can only do so much, but if they at least tried to make a difference, they could. We live in a world where EVERYTHING has a rating system, and parents should look at this and make a WISE decision on whether or not that form of media is appropriate for their children. I'm not saying that parents should put their kids in some sort of plastic bubble world where they are sheltered from all that is "evil". I just think that parents should properly educate their children about promiscuous sex and its potential consequences. Then, they should reinforce this by putting up standards as to whats allowed and whats not allowed.

That's just my $0.02. I'm not a parenting expert and I don't claim to be. Thats just my point of view.

2ndGen.Rocket
04-06-2006, 05:11 PM
Yeah, there is one flaw in their studies, and it's called the 60's. Television and media in general was nowhere near what it is today, and neither was music. Yet people were still fucking like rabbits back then, and possibly much more stupid about doing so than people are today.

These research studies are retarded, I'd like to know who gives people grants to do this.

JOIN THE FORUM LOUNGE!

By Joining The Forum Lounge you will be able to see the pictures in this thread and post a reply. Also, after 25 posts you'll be able to see the hidden forums as well!

It's free and all of your information is confidential.

Click here to begin interacting!
Click here to register