I currently have an analog G-shock. Thinking about change of watch.

Both are atomic-timekeeping & solar/battery powered. Basically I'll never have to worry if the time is accurate and if the watch is going to work.

This one MSRP for $400.00

http://static.zoovy.com/img/bestdealsontheplanet/W304-H449-Bffffff/gw1200ba_1a

This one MSRP for $150.00

http://216.25.78.123/bigpics/Casio/MTG900DA9V.jpg

or

http://static.zoovy.com/img/bestdealsontheplanet/W327-H500-Bffffff/M/mtg920da1v.jpg

I like the second one....

who spends $400 on a watch?!?!?!?!


thats crazy

The first one has Titanium-coated wrist band.

Perhaps that is where the jump in price comes from.

my view on watches is eather wear an $8 timex, or spend your money on something with a nice swiss clockwork movement.


$400 for a watch with a $5 quartz movement?
It wont be worth anything imidiatley after you buy it.


But then again, if you really really like it. Get it. But get the anolog one.............................................

whats wrong with a $50 watch.........

who spends $400 on a watch?!?!?!?!


thats crazy

It's cheaper than that on market price. More like $250 from the cheapest tha I have seen.

I've always worn G-shock.

Tough as watches.

and now they have a luxury/elegant appeal to them.

Also I like that they are solar and atomic.

I'd go with the third one. I love analog watches, but the G-shock is too cluttered in analog form these days.

My current watch is this $35 G-shock that I bought at costco.

http://www.smartgespart.de/go/art_thumbs/tn_64_4214279.JPG

Sorry for the small pic since that is the only one that I can find.

That face is a dark/blue face.

Sorta bored with it and since it has a scratch on the glass, I like to use it as a beater watch.

On second thought I could get the 1st and 3rd one since they are different (metal band vs plastic, analog vs. digital)

who spends $400 on a watch?!?!?!?!


thats crazy



I spent about $3500 on mine. (yeah I'm stupid, but amazingly enough, I've never regreted it)

I have a titanium seiko kinetic. I love it. It feels weightless on your wrist. sma16 somthing is the model.

id get the 3rd one, the first one is too cluttred, the second is too birght, but the third is classy

I spent about $3500 on mine. (yeah I'm stupid, but amazingly enough, I've never regreted it)



you spent more money on a watch than i did when i got my 2nd gen vert

First one, hands down.

http://216.25.78.123/bigpics/Casio/MTG900DA9V.jpg

I've had one similar to this one for the past two years. It's a great watch, never more than a second off from the digital timeclock at my job, or the clock on my cable box. That's about as accurate as you can get.

I've dropped it off a three-story balcony onto concrete, and it didn't even phase it. And whenever it dies out, you can stick it under a table lamp overnight, and it recharges about halfway. Leave it under for a few days, and you can go months without seeing daylight, and it will still hold a charge, even through repeated use of the backlight.

The thing about the Rolex is that a few guys at work already have Breitlings, tag, and Rolex.

I don't want to be that conforming (in case ya'll haven't figured it out ;) )

id get the 3rd one, the first one is too cluttred, the second is too birght, but the third is classy

Isn't the whole idea of a cluttered watch suppose to mean that it's expenive through defination of vast details?

I like the third one. But I like black plastic or nylon. I use an IronMan timex as a daily work watch.

Quit pussyfootin around Batty, go pick up the first one ;)

Isn't the whole idea of a cluttered watch suppose to mean that it's expenive through defination of vast details?


lol, im just jealous. makes mine look cheap

http://www.watchgear.com/WatchGear/_images/products/FOS0100940_thumb.jpg

That watch looks like the cousin of the watch that they give to police officers when they retire.

That watch looks like the cousin of the watch that they give to polich officers when they retire.


that cheap eh? lol
i left mine at home when i went on a cruise, and i needed one. so i bought this. i think i spend like 70 bucks us on it? hhaha
keeps very good time though

The first one has Titanium-coated wrist band.

Perhaps that is where the jump in price comes from.

My watch has an actual Titanium wristband, and it still only cost me $55 bucks used. ($150 retail) Nicest watch I have ever owned, and the most reliable (sans my old Timex Digital that refuses to die. I am hard on watches, too (broke 3 in 6 months once).

i voted for the digital black......But then i saw the pic of the 1st one,and i'd go 4 that....I dont like big watches tho...i have a movado and a cheap wenger(swiss army knife)watch

I just found out that Costco has this for $229.00

It's gorgeous in person. The way the titanium looks makes it look like a Breitling or some high end watch.

http://static.zoovy.com/img/bestdealsontheplanet/W304-H449-Bffffff/gw1200ba_1a

I'm not a big fan of G-Shocks, they just seem cheap to me.

To me, they are just metal versions of the $5 Timex's at K-Mart; except they cost 100x as much.

I, personally, prefer a more classy, less cluttered watch.

i spent $1000 on my omega seamasterhttp://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b348/JB750il/mywatch.jpg and i also have a g shock http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b348/JB750il/mywatch2.jpgand i love both of them. the g shock is a good work/play watch.

o and p.s. i got both of them at costco

naw, this one is nice in person.

and it's light.