| JOIN THE FORUM LOUNGE! By Joining The Forum Lounge you will be able to see the pictures in this thread and post a reply. Also, after 25 posts you'll be able to see the hidden forums as well! It's free and all of your information is confidential. |
Join in on this Discussion and see the pictures. Click here-> : who won
Misty Rayne 11-04-2008, 10:21 PM i think i missed it who won the election? czarofzar 11-04-2008, 10:23 PM someone black DarkAngelKamui 11-04-2008, 10:23 PM http://www.theforumlounge.com/so-t12734.html Misty Rayne 11-04-2008, 10:24 PM yeah thanx :) i saw lol aznpoopy 11-05-2008, 09:09 AM www.google.com toyo7 11-05-2008, 10:39 AM our great country lost :( Stanello 11-05-2008, 06:28 PM Care to explain? wotnartd 11-05-2008, 06:54 PM How did we lose? Misty Rayne 11-06-2008, 03:27 PM your great country was dragged into a huge ass shit hole because of georgieporgie, i would have thought that a) you'd be glad to get rid of him and b) be open to letting someone fix his huge catastrophes wether it was Obama or not, i think he will do good for your country Vert8813B 11-06-2008, 04:39 PM I think Bush did as good a job as anyone could have considering the circumstances. Herschel 11-06-2008, 06:01 PM I think Bush did as good a job as anyone could have considering the circumstances. Really? Are you sure? Animal 11-06-2008, 08:52 PM I think Bush did as good a job as anyone could have considering the circumstances. +1. There's things he could have done differently, sure. No president has been put in a situation like 11Sep02. He did what needed to be done IMO. He did things Clinton should have done, but didn't have teh balls to do. Tofuball 11-06-2008, 09:00 PM Patriot Act I & II. Not Vetoing the Bailout. Asking Israel to give up land "for peace." Huge black marks IMHO. But I think this new prez will make us miss Bush. We'll see. At least the MSM will sugarcoat everything so that we'll feel good about it. Vert8813B 11-06-2008, 10:14 PM Really? Are you sure? Ya rly. 2ndGen.Rocket 11-08-2008, 08:07 AM Below is an article about the extreme success of our missions in Iraq. Something that is conveniently not reported by the shitbag US media, who would rather have you believe that our President is some sort of evil corporate villain, and Obama is the only answer to that problem. This election was disgusting, and once again I am thoroughly appalled by how fucking stupid the majority of the people in this country are. Ready for a shock? Below is an article from the London Times about our military. Winning Isn't News By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY Iraq : What would happen if the U.S. won a war but the media didn't tell the American public? Apparently, we have to rely on a British newspaper for the news that we've defeated the last remnants of al-Qaida in Iraq . London 's Sunday Times called it 'the culmination of one of the most spectacular victories of the war on terror.' A terrorist force that once numbered more than 12,000, with strongholds in the west and central regions of Iraq , has over two years been reduced to a mere 1,200 fighters, backed against the wall in the northern city of Mosul . The destruction of al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI) is one of the most unlikely and unforeseen events in the long history of American warfare. We can thank President Bush's surge strategy, in which he bucked both Republican and Democratic leaders in Washington by increasing our forces there instead of surrendering. We can also thank the leadership of the new general he placed in charge there, David Petraeus, who may be the foremost expert in the world on counter-insurgency warfare. And we can thank those serving in our military in Iraq who engaged local Iraqi tribal leaders and convinced them America was their friend and AQI their enemy. Al-Qaida's loss of the hearts and minds of ordinary Iraqis began in Anbar Province, which had been written off as a basket case, and spread out from there. Now, in Operation Lion's Roar the Iraqi army and the U.S. 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment is destroying the fraction of terrorists who are left. More than 1,000 AQI operatives have already been apprehended. Sunday Times reporter Marie Colvin, traveling with Iraqi forces in Mosul , found little AQI presence even in bullet-ridden residential areas that were once insurgency strongholds, and reported that the terrorists have lost control of its Mosul urban base, with what is left of the organization having fled south into the countryside. Meanwhile, the State Department reports that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government has achieved 'satisfactory' progress on 15 of the 18 political benchmarks 'a big change for the better from a year ago.' Things are going so well that Maliki has even for the first time floated the idea of a timetable for withdrawal of American forces. He did so while visiting the United Arab Emirates , which over the weekend announced that it was forgiving almost $7 billion of debt owed by Baghdad , an impressive vote of confidence from a fellow Arab state in the future of a free Iraq . But where are the headlines and the front-page stories about all this good news? As the Media Research Center pointed out last week, 'the CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News and CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 were silent Tuesday night about the benchmarks 'that signaled political progress.' The war in Iraq has been turned around180 degrees both militarily and politically because the president stuck to his guns. Yet apart from IBD, Fox News Channel and parts of the foreign press, the media don't seem to consider this historic event a big story. Copyright 2008 Investor's Business Daily. All Rights Reserved. Addendum: The reason you haven't seen this on American television or read about it in the American press is simple--journalism is 'dead' in this country. They are controlled by Liberals who would rather see our troops defeated than recognize a successful Republican initiated response to 9/11 czarofzar 11-08-2008, 08:31 AM i don't agree with the addendum. there are plenty journalistic medias in the US. the report itself lacks sources. president bush can broadcast anything he wants if it was important. apparently, this news wasn't. 2ndGen.Rocket 11-08-2008, 02:49 PM With all the success that we have had in Iraq though, we've heard nothing about it. The only thing we are told about is American body count, and civilian casualty. Shouldn't this be front page news? Tofuball 11-09-2008, 09:40 AM MSM = boldly liberal bias. Fox = bleh. czarofzar 11-09-2008, 10:45 AM With all the success that we have had in Iraq though, we've heard nothing about it. The only thing we are told about is American body count, and civilian casualty. Shouldn't this be front page news? depends who doesn't want the news on there. maybe the military refused to confirm or deny for intelligence reasons. who knows but this whole conspiracy theory isn't clear for both sides. thats why I'm cautious but im glad for this particular news and should be on the front page if it is true. |
| JOIN THE FORUM LOUNGE! By Joining The Forum Lounge you will be able to see the pictures in this thread and post a reply. Also, after 25 posts you'll be able to see the hidden forums as well! It's free and all of your information is confidential. |